In recent decades, children have been told that hard work and perseverance lead to success. This advice proved true for many talented and diligent individuals who made their own fortunes, regardless of their inherited wealth. However, the significance of hereditary wealth is rising in the rich world.
This poses a potential problem for capitalism and society. The increase in wealth among baby-boomers means that more money will be passed on to the next generation. This growing trend of inheritocracy is problematic as it undermines the meritocratic foundations of modern economies.
The shifting dynamics within economies where inherited wealth is becoming a critical factor in an individual’s financial success could exacerbate economic inequality and limit social mobility. This threatens the principles of fairness and hard work being the primary determinants of success. As societies grapple with these changes, there will be ongoing debates about the role of inheritance in economic structures and the policies needed to address growing disparities.
The challenge lies in balancing the benefits of inherited wealth with the need to maintain a dynamic and fair economic system where opportunities are available to all based on merit, not just birthright. Australia’s baby boomers, the nation’s richest generation, are expected to bequeath $3.5 trillion to younger generations in the coming decades through inheritance. This massive transfer of wealth is poised to significantly impact society by altering wealth distribution and raising broader moral questions.
Patrick Stokes, an associate professor of philosophy at Deakin University, argues that inheritance presents a clash between two ethical considerations: distributive justice—what’s best for society—and personal autonomy or individual rights. “[On the one hand], it’s my money. I earned it, I can spend it how I want — so I can give it to my kids, right?
But the problem is that if many of those transactions happen, you end up with big inequalities [in society],” Dr. Stokes explains. Australia abolished inheritance tax in 1979 under the Malcolm Fraser Coalition government.
Critics argue that the absence of such a tax favors wealthier households, exacerbating wealth inequality. Dr.
inheritance impact on australian economy
Stokes highlights the ethical responsibilities of both the recipient and the donor of an inheritance to ensure the wealth is used for good. These responsibilities emphasize the need for recipients to use inherited wealth for the social good. Dale Schilling, who recently drew up his will, chose to donate his inheritance to charities meaningful to him, such as BirdLife Australia and BackTrack, a social enterprise supporting rural and regional youth.
He believes in supporting causes that are both personally significant and socially beneficial. “I think you do want to be open and transparent,” Mr. Schilling says.
He discusses inheritance with his relatives, aiming to keep the conversations humorous and light-hearted. As Australia navigates this unprecedented wealth transfer, balancing ethical considerations of personal autonomy and societal good will remain a crucial, ongoing conversation. In Jane Austen’s “Pride and Prejudice,” the mention of Mr.
Bingley’s “four or five thousand a year” immediately conveyed wealth and security to the 19th-century reader. It was widely understood: Mr. Bingley was an heir.
Marrying the right person was the surest path to riches. Fast forward to 2025, inheritance remains a significant factor in wealth accumulation. The economic principle that wealth begets wealth is especially true in today’s world.
The major shift lies in the demographics and size of these inheritances as baby boomers begin to transfer unprecedented wealth to their heirs. Economic analysts predict a major “bequest boom” as this generational wealth changes hands. This enormous transfer of wealth is poised to reshape both personal fortunes and broader economic trends.
Heirs stand to gain fortunes far beyond their salaries or investments, substantially affecting markets and personal financial planning. Economists warn, however, that relying solely on inheritances may not be a sustainable financial strategy for everyone. The distribution will be uneven, and many may need to consider alternative strategies to secure financial stability.
Photo by; Sandy Millar on Unsplash